The article discusses differing opinions on player performances after a recent match between Tottenham and Roma.
Roma has faced challenges, including changing coaches three times and being close to the relegation zone in Serie A. Despite these issues, the team managed to secure a draw against Tottenham, which was viewed positively by the press.
Many players from Roma received good ratings from various newspapers. Gazzetta rated Angelino as the best player on the field, giving him a score of 7 out of 10. He played a key role by assisting Mats Hummels’ late goal.
Corriere dello Sport also praised Angelino, giving him a score of 6.5. However, they felt that other players like Mile Svilar, Hummels, Evan N’dicka, Manu Koné, and Paulo Dybala deserved higher ratings, with a score of 7. CorSport named N’dicka as the man of the match.
On the other hand, opinions differed when it came to the most disappointing players. Gazzetta rated Rodrigo Bentancur at 5.5, while Corriere dello Sport gave him a score of 6.5.
Similarly, Zeki Celik from Roma received a score of 5 from Gazzetta but was rated 6.5 by Corriere dello Sport. This split in ratings shows how different perspectives can arise from the same match.
Overall, the match highlighted both the strengths and weaknesses of the players involved. The differing opinions from the media reflect the complexity of evaluating performances in football. Fans and analysts alike will continue to discuss these ratings as the season progresses.
Image Credit: www.yahoo.com